Сообщить об ошибке

Подтвердить права

Добавьте бота @sdsearchtestbot администратором ресурса, затем нажмите «Проверить».

Пожаловаться

Аватар English Posts

English Posts

@PoliFightsEn
Вступить в канал
25подписчиков / участников
0,0рейтинг
Каналтип ресурса
10.09.2026добавлен
美国左右互搏群 @PoliFights 的英文辅助频道。 美国政坛,风云变换,共和民主,两党格斗,左右互搏,驴象操戈,剑拔弩张!关心美国政治的,欢迎入群参与。顺便测试一下你的美国政治常识。入群先要考试。本群是电报上第一个入群要严格考试的高端群😂,也是唯一能包容左右观点,群管纪录公开的中文群。 本群使用先进的人工智能技术,一视同仁地实时删除98%的脏话和自动禁言。确保大家自由文明讨论! 没时间;不想看吵架?订阅我们的精品政论频道 @PoliFight。
📰 Новости и медиа Английский📍 Международный🔓 Публичный

Последние публикации

🖼Фото
Announcement: Due to technical issues we are moving to a new channel, https://t.me/poltx This channel will be closed.
🖼Фото
The unstated scandal: The CIA collected info on President Trump According to Durham, Joffe and his associates manipulated that data to make it seem like Trump, and those in Trump’s world, had suspicious interactions with internet protocol (IP) addresses affiliated with a Russian mobile phone provider. They then combined those allegations with the Alfa Bank hoax materials (the subject of Sussmann’s Fall 2016 meeting with then-FBI General Counsel James Baker). This damaging information, purporting to demonstrate at least circumstantial evidence of Trump/Russia collusion, was presented on February 9, 2017 to what Durham describes as U.S. Government “Agency-2.” That agency was the CIA. We know for sure that Sussmann met with the CIA General Counsel. We learned in January 2022 that, if Sussmann is to be believed, there were two other CIA employees at that meeting. In other words, a Clinton supporting contractor (Joffe) obtained sensitive information (perhaps unlawfully) about the Office of the President of the United States (Trump), manipulated the information, passed it to a DNC/Clinton lawyer (Sussmann), who then delivered it to the CIA. All on American soil. This is important because the CIA is generally prohibited from conducting domestic operations. The FBI explains: “The CIA collects information only regarding foreign countries and their citizens. Unlike the FBI, it is prohibited from collecting information regarding ‘U.S. Persons,’ a term that includes U.S. citizens, resident aliens, legal immigrants, and U.S. corporations, regardless of where they are located.” In the CIA’s own words: “The FBI is responsible for coordination of clandestine collection of foreign intelligence through human sources or human-enabled means and counterintelligence activities inside the United States.” Yet when it came to Trump, here was the CIA doing what it is prohibited: “collecting information regarding U.S. persons” inside the United States.2 (See also the CIA’s bulk surveillance program.) A top CIA official answered the call of a DNC lawyer who alleged that these suspicious internet “lookups” proved “that Trump and/or his associates were using supposedly rare, Russian-made wireless phones in the vicinity of the White House and other locations.” Accusations that were baseless, according to Durham. In other words, the secret police was more than willing to accept politically damaging information against the President. I’m curious what they did with it. It seems naive to think the information stayed at the CIA. I bet it was passed onto the FBI or DOJ, who may have used it to further the Trump/Russia investigation. The scandal we are seeing come to light just isn’t about Hillary and Joffe and Sussmann. It’s not limited to Fusion GPS, FISA abuse, or Igor Danchenko. It’s also about the willingness of U.S. intelligence to target the President. And on that topic, the CIA has some serious questions to answer. English
🖼Фото
Xi Jinping Criticizes Trudeau's Heavy-Handed Approach READ
🖼Фото
Trudeau Watching Old Footage Of Tiananmen Square For Ideas READ
🖼Фото · 2 шт.
On February 2nd, Professor J. Alex Halderman sent his unredacted Dominion machine report to CISA and on the 4th he sent it to Dominion per the judge's authorization Now both Dominion and CISA are filling emergency motions to keep the report sealed from the public WHY? Dominion specifically wants to prevent OAN, Newsmax & Fox News from seeing it. Also opposing motions from Mike Lindell, Sidney Powell, Patrick Bryne and Rudy Guiliani If they had nothing to hide, why the panic?

Продвижение